Bitcoin’s Inflation-Adjusted Peak Falls Short of $100K, Galaxy Exec Reveals

Galaxy's Alex Thorn reveals Bitcoin never surpassed $100,000 in inflation-adjusted terms, despite its nominal peak of $126,000. This analysis underscores the impact of inflation on Bitcoin's real purchasing power and raises questions about its effectiveness as an inflation hedge.

Dec 31, 2025, 01:38 PM

Key Takeaways

  • 1# Bitcoin’s Inflation-Adjusted Peak Falls Short of $100K, Galaxy Exec Reveals In a sobering reality check for Bitcoin enthusiasts, Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital has revealed that Bitcoin's value has never truly surpassed the symbolic $100,000 mark when adjusted for inflation.
  • 2While Bitcoin’s nominal peak reached $126,000, inflation-adjusted calculations show that its real purchasing power topped out at just $99,848—missing the milestone by a mere $152.
  • 3## What We Know According to Alex Thorn’s analysis, Bitcoin’s all-time high value in nominal terms does not tell the full story.
  • 4Adjusted for inflation, the cryptocurrency's purchasing power fell short of the six-figure milestone often celebrated by investors and media.
  • 5The analysis, reported by both Cointelegraph and BITRSS, highlights the gap between Bitcoin's nominal peak and its real value.

Bitcoin’s Inflation-Adjusted Peak Falls Short of $100K, Galaxy Exec Reveals

In a sobering reality check for Bitcoin enthusiasts, Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital has revealed that Bitcoin's value has never truly surpassed the symbolic $100,000 mark when adjusted for inflation. While Bitcoin’s nominal peak reached $126,000, inflation-adjusted calculations show that its real purchasing power topped out at just $99,848—missing the milestone by a mere $152.

What We Know

According to Alex Thorn’s analysis, Bitcoin’s all-time high value in nominal terms does not tell the full story. Adjusted for inflation, the cryptocurrency's purchasing power fell short of the six-figure milestone often celebrated by investors and media. The analysis, reported by both Cointelegraph and BITRSS, highlights the gap between Bitcoin's nominal peak and its real value.

Thorn’s calculations reveal a $26,152 difference between Bitcoin’s nominal peak of $126,000 and its inflation-adjusted equivalent of $99,848. This discrepancy underscores the impact of inflation on asset valuations and serves as a reminder that raw price figures can be misleading when evaluating long-term performance.

Key Details

The distinction between nominal and inflation-adjusted values is a critical nuance often overlooked in cryptocurrency price reporting. While $126,000 represents Bitcoin's peak price in current dollars, the inflation-adjusted figure accounts for the erosion of purchasing power over time. This adjustment is particularly relevant in an era of elevated inflation, where the real value of assets can differ significantly from their nominal prices.

Galaxy Digital, a leading digital asset and blockchain-focused firm, lends credibility to the technical rigor of this analysis. Thorn’s insights emphasize the importance of evaluating asset performance through multiple lenses, particularly for investors who view Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation or a store of value.

Why This Matters

This inflation-adjusted perspective has significant implications for how Bitcoin’s performance is evaluated. For investors and analysts, the revelation that Bitcoin has not crossed $100,000 in real terms challenges its reputation as “digital gold” and raises questions about its effectiveness as an inflation hedge.

Psychological price levels, such as $100,000, often serve as critical support and resistance points in financial markets. Learning that Bitcoin has not achieved this milestone in inflation-adjusted terms may influence investor sentiment and market dynamics. It also underscores the importance of considering inflation when assessing long-term investment performance.

For a cryptocurrency often touted as a safeguard against inflation, the near-miss is particularly noteworthy. If Bitcoin’s real purchasing power has yet to reach six figures despite its nominal success, it suggests that its role in preserving wealth during periods of high inflation may be less robust than some advocates claim.

As Bitcoin continues to mature as an asset class, analyses like Thorn’s will likely become increasingly important for institutional investors and long-term holders seeking a comprehensive understanding of its performance. By highlighting the gap between nominal and real values, this analysis encourages a more nuanced approach to evaluating Bitcoin’s role in a diversified portfolio.

Key entities: Alex Thorn, Galaxy Digital, Bitcoin
Sentiment: Bearish

Related Articles

Latest News