Clarity Act Draft Would Bar Trump From Crypto Until 2029, Shield Developers
A new draft of the Clarity Act, a long-stalled market-structure bill, includes a provision barring sitting officials and their spouses from issuing digital assets until 2029. The bill also protects non-custodial developers from liability, though enforcement authority rests solely with the DOJ.
Written by CoinArticle’s AI Newsroom · from 2 cited sources. How we work
Key Restrictions and Protections
The latest draft of the Clarity Act includes an ethics provision that would prohibit sitting government officials and their spouses from issuing digital assets, with the restriction set to expire in 2029. The bill also shields non-custodial software developers from regulatory liability for how users deploy their code, a long-sought protection for the open-source development community.
Enforcement of the ethics ban would fall entirely to the Department of Justice, according to the Decrypt reporting. No separate agency or mechanism is specified to monitor compliance.
Legislative Status and Prospects
The Clarity Act has faced repeated delays and rewrites over several years as lawmakers attempt to balance industry demands for clarity with broader market-structure concerns. According to Crypto Briefing, an earlier version of the bill passed with 37% support in a hypothetical 2026 vote, suggesting the provision targeting current officeholders may face continued resistance from some lawmakers and industry participants.
Why It Matters
For Traders
If passed, the bill removes one category of regulatory uncertainty around digital asset issuance by sitting officials, though the practical market impact depends on future administration changes and enforcement vigor.
For Investors
The bill's developer-liability shield could reduce frivolous litigation risk for protocol projects, while the ethics sunset in 2029 creates a known policy discontinuity that could affect medium-term political dynamics around crypto.
For Builders
Non-custodial developers gain explicit legal protection for their code under the bill, but only if passed; the DOJ-only enforcement model may leave gray areas around liability for custody and exchange-like functions.
This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Read the full disclaimer.
