Fidelity Settles California Crypto Withdrawal Case for $500,000
California secured a $500,000 settlement with Fidelity Digital Asset Services over restrictions that prevented some customers from transferring purchased cryptocurrencies to personal wallets. The dispute centered on whether self-custody access constitutes legal delivery under California commodity law.
Written by CoinArticle’s AI Newsroom · from 2 cited sources. How we work
The Settlement Terms
California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the $500,000 settlement on October 16. The agreement requires Fidelity to provide advance notice if it ends its retail crypto transfer feature and preserves existing security restrictions and IRA account exclusions from wallet-transfer functionality. The settlement does not require retroactive payouts to affected customers or forced changes to current operational procedures.
The Core Dispute
California challenged Fidelity's historical restrictions on external withdrawals, arguing that state commodity law requires physical delivery of purchased assets within a defined period — and that delivery of cryptocurrency means the buyer must be able to transfer the asset away from the dealer's platform. Fidelity told investigators it had withheld external withdrawal capability pending approval from the New York Department of Financial Services, which arrived in April 2025. The company enabled transfers after receiving that approval.
Fidelity disputes that its earlier conduct breached California law. The state maintains the pre-2025 restrictions were unlawful. This disagreement remains unresolved in the settlement, which does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing by either party.
Why It Matters
For Traders
Fidelity's external transfer feature remains operational post-settlement, though IRA accounts are excluded; no immediate trading or custody mechanics change.
For Investors
The case signals state regulators are enforcing self-custody rights in spot purchases, but Fidelity's staggered compliance via NYDFS approval suggests federal and state frameworks may still diverge.
For Builders
Custody and withdrawal mechanisms tied to IRAs face a separate regulatory category; builders integrating Fidelity liquidity or custody should confirm IRA restrictions in their terms.
This article is for information only and is not financial advice. Read the full disclaimer.
